
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 260.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅102.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅250% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 80).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 260.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅102.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅250% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 80).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 117 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 26,498 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 122.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2055 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) with 80 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 26,498+123% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 8960+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 36.83 TFLOPS+310% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2055 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 280+250% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 8.8 MB+252% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 70+250% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 280+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 92.9% advantage for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 432 GB/s+93% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 7.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-7% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 189.3+107% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 87.5% less ($1750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 13.3 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 259.4% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-88% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+259% | 13.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | GB203 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #224 | #48 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













