
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Tesla M40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+16.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1068.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,220 vs 11,892).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌904% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅+16.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1068.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,220 vs 11,892).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌904% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Tesla M40?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M40 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 115 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Tesla M40

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Tesla M40
Tesla M40
The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Tesla M40's 10,220 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 16.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Tesla M40 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+16% | 10,220 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3072+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+32% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+58% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 192+140% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+127% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40) — the Tesla M40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.0 (Tesla M40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Tesla M40's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Tesla M40). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-48% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+124% | 40.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 launched at $2500. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 90% less ($2251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4.1 (Tesla M40) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1065.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-90% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+1066% | 4.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | GM200 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #224 | #256 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













