
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Tesla T4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+17.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,631 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 784.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
- ❌39.9% longer card at 235mm vs 168mm.
Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 235mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,153 vs 11,892).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌655% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅+17.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,631 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 784.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 235mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
- ❌39.9% longer card at 235mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,153 vs 11,892).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌655% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Tesla T4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla T4 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Tesla T4

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Tesla T4
Tesla T4
The Tesla T4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 585 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Tesla T4's 10,153 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 17.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Tesla T4 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,560 (Tesla T4). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8.141 TFLOPS (Tesla T4). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1590 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 40 (Tesla T4) with 80 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+17% | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+10% | 8.141 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+10% | 1590 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 40+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 320+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla T4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Tesla T4) — the Tesla T4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (Tesla T4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC (Turing) (Tesla T4). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Tesla T4).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Tesla T4's 70W — a 60% difference. The Tesla T4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Tesla T4). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 76°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 168mm |
| Height | 124mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-1% | 76°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 145.0+58% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla T4 launched at $1880. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 86.8% less ($1631 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5.4 (Tesla T4) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 785.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-87% | $1880 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+785% | 5.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | TU104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | September 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #224 | #260 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













