
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 285W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 285mm, a 45mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅7.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅76.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 136).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌60.1% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 285W vs 165W.
- ❌18.8% longer card at 285mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 39%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 136 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,713 | 31,578+39% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 7680+76% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+82% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2610 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 136 | 240+76% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 7.5 MB+74% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 60+76% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 240+76% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation in supported games, so this part of the feature set is broadly comparable.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 504 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 53.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 285mm, occupying 2.2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-42% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-21% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2.2 | 2-9% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 137.7+24% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB came in at $499, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB was 37.5% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 15.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-38% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.5+15% | 39.5 |
| Codename | AD106 | AD104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #56 | #11 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














