
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs GeForce RTX 4090 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs GeForce RTX 4090 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs GeForce RTX 4090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 450W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 512), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 4090
2022Why buy it
- ✅36.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅276.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (512 vs 136).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌220.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 450W vs 165W.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs GeForce RTX 4090 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 4090
The GeForce RTX 4090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,112 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 versus the GeForce RTX 4090's 38,112 — the GeForce RTX 4090 leads by 67.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4090 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 16,384 (GeForce RTX 4090). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 128 (GeForce RTX 4090) with 136 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,713 | 38,112+68% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 16384+276% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+274% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 176+267% |
| TMUs | 136 | 512+276% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 16 MB+272% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 72 MB+125% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 128+276% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 512+276% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation in supported games, so this part of the feature set is broadly comparable.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 carries 24 GB. GeForce RTX 4090 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and 384-bit on the GeForce RTX 4090. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090) — the GeForce RTX 4090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 72 MB+125% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4090). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the GeForce RTX 4090's 450W — a 92.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 4090). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 240mm vs 304mm, occupying 2.2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-63% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-45% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 240mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2.2-27% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 137.7+63% | 84.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB came in at $499, while the GeForce RTX 4090 launched at $1599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB was 68.8% cheaper ($1100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 23.8 (GeForce RTX 4090) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 91.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-69% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.5+91% | 23.8 |
| Codename | AD106 | AD102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #56 | #4 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














