GeForce4 MX 440SE vs GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce4 MX 440SE
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce4 MX 440SE uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce4 MX 440SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 201180% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 MX 440SE.
| Insight | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-201180%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+201180%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+1100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $60 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 164278.7% better value per dollar than the GeForce4 MX 440SE.
| Insight | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+164278.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 MX 440SE and GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce4 MX 440SE
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440SE scores 5 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 201180%. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 10,064+201180% |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2560+186% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+175% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1733 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 160+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 MX 440SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 12+71% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 4.5+246% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: No vs NVDEC (Pascal).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 MX 440SE draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 151.2% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 165mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-86% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 165mm | 173mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 55.9+27850% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 MX 440SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce4 MX 440SE costs 18.3% less ($11 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 167600% better value. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-18% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 167.7+167600% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GP104 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #523 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 MX 440SE and GeForce GTX 1060
