GeForce4 MX 460 vs Radeon IGP 340M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 MX 460 vs Radeon IGP 340M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 MX 460 vs Radeon IGP 340M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 MX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 230W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon IGP 340M

2018

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅GeForce4 MX 460 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon IGP 340M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
❌43.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 MX 460 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon IGP 340M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 MX 460 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 MX 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon IGP 340M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce4 MX 460 vs Radeon IGP 340M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 460

The GeForce4 MX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon IGP 340M

The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 460 scores 4 versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 3 — the GeForce4 MX 460 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce4 MX 460 is built on Fermi while the Radeon IGP 340M uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M).

Feature	GeForce4 MX 460	Radeon IGP 340M
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 5.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	336	3584+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9072 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS+1085%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	224+300%
L1 Cache	448 KB	896 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 MX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon IGP 340M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 460	Radeon IGP 340M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 MX 460 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 340M carries 512 MB. Radeon IGP 340M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 460 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 340M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 4 MB (Radeon IGP 340M) — the Radeon IGP 340M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 460	Radeon IGP 340M
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 MX 460 draws 160W versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 230W — a 35.9% difference. The GeForce4 MX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 340M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 460	Radeon IGP 340M
TDP	160W-30%	230W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	165mm	—
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon IGP 340M (2018 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce4 MX 460	Radeon IGP 340M
MSRP	$179	—
Codename	GF104	Vega 10
Release	July 12 2010	August 26 2018
Ranking	#652	#593

Search GeForce4 MX 460 on Amazon

Search Radeon IGP 340M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.