Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P2000 (móvel).
| Insight | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Quadro P2000 (móvel) reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 1291 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500+3% | 5,353 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 1152+28700% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz+51% | 1291 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+78% | 432 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+414% | 71.4 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 35.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 35.7 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GP106 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | February 15 2019 |
| Ranking | #495 | #399 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Quadro P2000 (móvel)
