Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

15

5,500

+0.5%

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

170

5,474

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM.

Insight	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity	Xe LPG (2023) (5nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM reaches 5,474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 980 MHz.

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,474
Architecture	Xe LPG	Kepler
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4	1344+33500%
Boost Clock	1950 MHz+99%	980 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	192 GB/s
Bus Width	System	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
DirectX	12_2	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Decoder: QuickSync vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM).

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Encoder	QuickSync	1st Gen NVENC
Decoder	QuickSync	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs	MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM's 170W — a 167.6% difference. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.