Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 474.1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc).
| Insight | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-474.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+474.1%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 474.1%. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 31,578+474% |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 7680+191900% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz | 2610 MHz+34% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 180% difference. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+231% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($590 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 53.5 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | AD104 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #494 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
