Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Arc A310
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
Arc A310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Arc A310
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A310.
| Insight | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and Arc A310
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Arc A310 reaches 5,438 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Arc A310 uses Generation 12.7, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 768 (Arc A310). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500+1% | 5,438 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 768+19100% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz | 2000 MHz+3% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 124 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A310). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A310). Decoder: QuickSync vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | QuickSync | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Arc A310's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 300W (Arc A310). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 169mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 169mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+406% | 72.5 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Arc A310 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 54.4 (Arc A310) — the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 54.4 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | DG2-128 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #494 | #422 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and Arc A310
