
GRID K140Q vs GeForce 920M

GRID K140Q
Popular choices:

GeForce 920M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K140Q is positioned at rank 197 and the GeForce 920M is on rank 355, so the GRID K140Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K140Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K140Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 920M.
| Insight | GRID K140Q | GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID K140Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K140Q and GeForce 920M

GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.

GeForce 920M
The GeForce 920M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K140Q scores 728 and the GeForce 920M reaches 717 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K140Q is built on Kepler while the GeForce 920M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K140Q) vs 256 (GeForce 920M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920M).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 728+2% | 717 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+500% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+350% | 0.5084 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K140Q) vs 1 MB (GeForce 920M) — the GeForce 920M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K140Q) vs 11.0 (GeForce 920M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 11.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q) vs No (GeForce 920M). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo HD VP5.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3rd Gen | No |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K140Q draws 225W versus the GeForce 920M's 16W — a 173.4% difference. The GeForce 920M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K140Q) vs 350W (GeForce 920M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 16W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 44.8+1300% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 920M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $125 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | GM108 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #628 | #864 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











