
GRID K140Q vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

GRID K140Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K140Q is positioned at rank 197 and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI is on rank 409, so the GRID K140Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K140Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K140Q.
| Insight | GRID K140Q | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 285M SLI holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1160.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K140Q | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1160.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K140Q and GeForce GTX 285M SLI

GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.

GeForce GTX 285M SLI
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K140Q scores 728 and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI reaches 734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K140Q is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 285M SLI uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K140Q) vs 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 728 | 734 |
| Architecture | Kepler | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+500% | 256 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K140Q) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo HD VP2.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3rd Gen | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K140Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 285M SLI's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K140Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 4.9+53% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI costs 92% less ($460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.5 (GRID K140Q) vs 18.4 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) — the GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers 1126.7% better value. The GRID K140Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $125 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $40-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 18.4+1127% |
| Codename | GK104 | N10E-GTX |
| Release | June 28 2013 | March 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #628 | #753 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















