
GRID M60-1B vs FirePro V7900

GRID M60-1B
Popular choices:

FirePro V7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M60-1B is positioned at rank 357 and the FirePro V7900 is on rank 279, so the FirePro V7900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-1B
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7900
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V7900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M60-1B.
| Insight | GRID M60-1B | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V7900 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V7900 holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $120), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M60-1B | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-1B and FirePro V7900

GRID M60-1B
The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.

FirePro V7900
The FirePro V7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,261 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-1B scores 2,256 and the FirePro V7900 reaches 2,261 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the FirePro V7900 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-1B) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7900). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7900).
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,256 | 2,261 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+60% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+160% | 1.856 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+140% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-1B) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro V7900) — the GRID M60-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-1B) vs 11.2 (FirePro V7900). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-1B draws 225W versus the FirePro V7900's 150W — a 40% difference. The FirePro V7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-1B) vs 350W (FirePro V7900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 279mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 279mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 100°C |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 15.1+51% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-1B launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the FirePro V7900 launched at $999 and now averages $120. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.8 (GRID M60-1B) vs 18.8 (FirePro V7900) — the FirePro V7900 offers 0% better value. The GRID M60-1B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $999-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.8 | 18.8 |
| Codename | GM204 | Cayman |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #525 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















