
GRID RTX6000-1Q vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID RTX6000-1Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID RTX6000-1Q.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX TITAN X holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $1,500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1150.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1150.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-1Q and GeForce GTX TITAN X

GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.

GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the GeForce GTX TITAN X reaches 12,621 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX TITAN X uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1075 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,617 | 12,621 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 6.691 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+10% | 1075 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.1 MB+47% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID RTX6000-1Q comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X has 12 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 2nd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 2nd gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 2nd gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN X's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 83°C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1+11% | 50.5 |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299 MSRP and currently averages $1500, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 and now averages $120. The GeForce GTX TITAN X costs 92% less ($1380 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.4 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 105.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 1152.4% better value.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6299 | $999-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | $120-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4 | 105.2+1152% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM200 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 17 2015 |
| Ranking | #525 | #209 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















