GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Arc A750
GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID RTX6000-1Q
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A750 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Arc A750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $229 versus $1,500 for the GRID RTX6000-1Q, it costs 85% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 554.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+554.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) | ✅More affordable ($229) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-1Q and Arc A750
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the Arc A750 reaches 12,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Arc A750 uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 3,584 (Arc A750). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,617 | 12,600 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3584+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+256% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2400 MHz+104% |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 128 | 224+75% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 16 MB (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A750). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the Arc A750's 225W — a 0% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 650W (Arc A750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 268mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 78°C-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1 | 56.0 |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299 MSRP and currently averages $1500, while the Arc A750 launched at $289 and now averages $229. The Arc A750 costs 84.7% less ($1271 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.4 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 55.0 (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 offers 554.8% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6299 | $289-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | $229-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4 | 55.0+555% |
| Codename | GM204 | DG2-512 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #525 | #212 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID RTX6000-1Q and Arc A750
