
GRID V100-8Q vs GeForce 6150

GRID V100-8Q
Popular choices:

GeForce 6150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6150
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 37.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID V100-8Q.
| Insight | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-37.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+37.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 6150 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $10,000), it costs 100% less, resulting in a 137400% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+137400%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10,000) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID V100-8Q and GeForce 6150

GRID V100-8Q
The GRID V100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16 points.

GeForce 6150
The GeForce 6150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GRID V100-8Q scores 16 versus the GeForce 6150's 22 — the GeForce 6150 leads by 37.5%. The GRID V100-8Q is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 6150 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100-8Q) vs 384 (GeForce 6150). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100-8Q) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6150). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16 | 22+38% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS+110% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz+26% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+122% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce 6150) — the GRID V100-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID V100-8Q draws 225W versus the GeForce 6150's 10W — a 183% difference. The GeForce 6150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100-8Q) vs 350W (GeForce 6150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 10W-96% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 2.2+2100% |
Value Analysis
The GRID V100-8Q launched at $10000 MSRP and currently averages $10000, while the GeForce 6150 launched at $30 and now averages $10. The GeForce 6150 costs 99.9% less ($9990 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.0 (GRID V100-8Q) vs 2.2 (GeForce 6150) — the GeForce 6150 offers 100+% better value. The GeForce 6150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10000 | $30-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10000 | $10-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 2.2 |
| Codename | GM107 | GP108 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #622 | #657 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















