
GRID V100-8Q vs GeForce FX Go5650

GRID V100-8Q
Popular choices:

GeForce FX Go5650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5650
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX Go5650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID V100-8Q.
| Insight | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX Go5650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID V100-8Q and GeForce FX Go5650

GRID V100-8Q
The GRID V100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16 points.

GeForce FX Go5650
The GeForce FX Go5650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GRID V100-8Q scores 16 versus the GeForce FX Go5650's 17 — the GeForce FX Go5650 leads by 6.3%. The GRID V100-8Q is built on Maxwell while the GeForce FX Go5650 uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100-8Q) vs 336 (GeForce FX Go5650). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100-8Q) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5650).
| Feature | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16 | 17+6% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Rankine |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+90% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS+54% | 1.089 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 448 KB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce FX Go5650) — the GRID V100-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID V100-8Q draws 225W versus the GeForce FX Go5650's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce FX Go5650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100-8Q) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go5650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GRID V100-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | GRID V100-8Q | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10000 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10000 | — |
| Codename | GM107 | GF114 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | May 17 2011 |
| Ranking | #622 | #605 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















