GRID V100-8Q vs GeForce Go 6200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6200

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

4836%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4646%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

4592%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

4584%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

4575%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

4549%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

4491%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4475%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4433%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

4421%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

4368%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4359%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

4280%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

4277%

#310

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

5333%

#325

GeForce Go 6200

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#326

GeForce 7300 GT

MSRP: $89|Avg: $20

93%

#327

Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $40

87%

#329

GeForce 7950 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

77%

#330

RADEON X550XT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $40

75%

#334

Radeon X1650 Pro

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

57%

#335

RADEON X550

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

57%

#337

Radeon HD 8350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $39

55%

#339

Radeon X1950 GT

MSRP: $140|Avg: $49

51%

#340

GeForce 6600 GT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

48%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID V100-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.7% higher G3D Mark score and 3025% more VRAM (512 MB vs 16 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 6200.

Insight	GRID V100-8Q	GeForce Go 6200
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+6.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+3025%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID V100-8Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID V100-8Q Benchmark Check

GeForce Go 6200 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID V100-8Q and GeForce Go 6200

GRID V100-8Q

The GRID V100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16 points.

GeForce Go 6200

The GeForce Go 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GRID V100-8Q scores 16 versus the GeForce Go 6200's 15 — the GRID V100-8Q leads by 6.7%. The GRID V100-8Q is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 6200 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100-8Q) vs 384 (GeForce Go 6200). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100-8Q) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6200).

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	GeForce Go 6200
G3D Mark Score	16+7%	15
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS+141%	0.6927 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	320 KB+900%	32 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	GeForce Go 6200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID V100-8Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6200 has 16 MB. The GRID V100-8Q offers 3025% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100-8Q) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 6200) — the GRID V100-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	GeForce Go 6200
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+3025%	0.016 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100-8Q draws 225W versus the GeForce Go 6200's 65W — a 110.3% difference. The GeForce Go 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100-8Q) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.