Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs GeForce GT 340
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 340
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is positioned at rank 412 and the GeForce GT 340 is on rank 170, so the GeForce GT 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics 615
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 340
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 340 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 340 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 615.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $50 for the Intel UHD Graphics 615, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 157.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+157.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and GeForce GT 340
Intel UHD Graphics 615
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.
GeForce GT 340
The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 scores 717 and the GeForce GT 340 reaches 738 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce GT 340 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 384 (GeForce GT 340). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 717 | 738+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4032 TFLOPS | 0.7626 TFLOPS+89% |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 340 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 340 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 340). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+8% | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs None (GeForce GT 340). Decoder: QuickSync vs VP4.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | None |
| Decoder | QuickSync | VP4 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 draws 15W versus the GeForce GT 340's 64W — a 124.1% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 300W (GeForce GT 340). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-77% | 64W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 47.8+316% | 11.5 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GT 340 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 340 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 36.9 (GeForce GT 340) — the GeForce GT 340 offers 158% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $20-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 36.9+158% |
| Codename | Amber Lake GT2 | GK107 |
| Release | November 7 2018 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #921 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 615 and GeForce GT 340
