Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs GRID K140Q
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Popular choices:
GRID K140Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is positioned at rank 412 and the GRID K140Q is on rank 197, so the GRID K140Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics 615
Performance Per Dollar GRID K140Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID K140Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K140Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 615.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $500 for the GRID K140Q, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 884.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+884.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and GRID K140Q
Intel UHD Graphics 615
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.
GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 scores 717 and the GRID K140Q reaches 728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GRID K140Q uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 1,536 (GRID K140Q). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 717 | 728+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1536+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4032 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+468% |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID K140Q has 512 MB. The GRID K140Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 11_0 (GRID K140Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 3rd Gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 1st Gen |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 draws 15W versus the GRID K140Q's 225W — a 175% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 350W (GRID K140Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 267mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 47.8+1394% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID K140Q launched at $125 and now averages $500. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 1.5 (GRID K140Q) — the Intel UHD Graphics 615 offers 853.3% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-20% | $125 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-90% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3+853% | 1.5 |
| Codename | Amber Lake GT2 | GK104 |
| Release | November 7 2018 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #921 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 615 and GRID K140Q
