Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is positioned at rank 412 and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI is on rank 409, so the GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics 615
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2009). The Intel UHD Graphics 615 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 615.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Intel UHD Graphics 615, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 28% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+28%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Intel UHD Graphics 615
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 scores 717 and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI reaches 734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce GTX 285M SLI uses G9x, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 717 | 734+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | G9x |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 256+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP2.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 285M SLI's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-90% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.8+876% | 4.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 18.4 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) — the GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers 28.7% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2009).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 18.4+29% |
| Codename | Amber Lake GT2 | N10E-GTX |
| Release | November 7 2018 | March 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #921 | #753 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 615 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI
