UHD Graphics 620 vs FirePro M4150

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4150

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

99%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

97%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

97%

#196

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2920%

#211

FirePro M4150

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#212

FirePro V4900

MSRP: $200|Avg: $47

100%

#213

GRID K160Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $30

99%

#215

Quadro

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

99%

#216

FirePro W5000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

98%

#219

FirePro W7000 Adapter

MSRP: $899|Avg: $15

96%

#220

Quadro K420

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

96%

#223

FirePro W7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $50

95%

#224

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

MSRP: $169|Avg: $100

94%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M4150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Intel UHD Graphics 620	FirePro M4150
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 620 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 Benchmark Check

FirePro M4150 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and FirePro M4150

Intel UHD Graphics 620

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 scores 1,041 and the FirePro M4150 reaches 1,011 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the FirePro M4150 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 384 (FirePro M4150). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	FirePro M4150
G3D Mark Score	1,041+3%	1,011
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm++	28 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.384 TFLOPS	0.5491 TFLOPS+43%
ROPs	3	8+167%
TMUs	24	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	FirePro M4150
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M4150 has 4 GB. The FirePro M4150 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	FirePro M4150
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 12 (FirePro M4150). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	FirePro M4150
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	6+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4150).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	FirePro M4150
Encoder	QuickSync	VCE 1.0
Decoder	QuickSync	UVD
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the FirePro M4150's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 350W (FirePro M4150). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	FirePro M4150
TDP	15W-90%	150W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	69.4+936%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro M4150 launched at $200 and now averages $50. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 20.2 (FirePro M4150) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	FirePro M4150
MSRP	$0-100%	$200
Avg Price (30d)	$0-100%	$50
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	20.2
Codename	Kaby Lake GT2	Opal
Release	September 1 2017	October 16 2013
Ranking	#875	#879