
Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs GeForce 930M

Intel UHD Graphics 620
Popular choices:

GeForce 930M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 930M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | GeForce 930M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 620 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M

Intel UHD Graphics 620
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.

GeForce 930M
The GeForce 930M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 scores 1,041 and the GeForce 930M reaches 1,011 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce 930M uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 384 (GeForce 930M). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 930M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 549 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | GeForce 930M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,041+3% | 1,011 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 0.4216 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+82% | 549 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | 8+167% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | GeForce 930M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 930M has 512 MB. The GeForce 930M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | GeForce 930M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 11.0 (GeForce 930M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | GeForce 930M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 930M). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce 930M).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | GeForce 930M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 2.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the GeForce 930M's 33W — a 75% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 350W (GeForce 930M). Power connectors: Integrated vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | GeForce 930M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-55% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 69.4+127% | 30.6 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | GeForce 930M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM108 |
| Release | September 1 2017 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #875 | #880 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












