Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GT 750M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Plus Graphics 640

15

1,353

+1.6%

HD Graphics 6000

Iris Graphics 6100

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

1,332

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

98%

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

96%

#148

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

326%

#150

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

296%

#151

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

295%

#155

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

268%

#156

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

266%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

100%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

100%

#172

GeForce GT 540M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 750M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Iris Plus Graphics 640	GeForce GT 750M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 640 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Plus Graphics 640 Benchmark Check

GeForce GT 750M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 640 and GeForce GT 750M

Iris Plus Graphics 640

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.

GeForce GT 750M

The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 scores 1,353 and the GeForce GT 750M reaches 1,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce GT 750M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 384 (GeForce GT 750M). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 967 MHz.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 640	GeForce GT 750M
G3D Mark Score	1,353+2%	1,332
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Kepler
Process Node	14 nm++	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8448 TFLOPS+14%	0.7427 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1100 MHz+14%	967 MHz
ROPs	6	16+167%
TMUs	48+50%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 640	GeForce GT 750M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 750M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 640	GeForce GT 750M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 12 (FL11) (GeForce GT 750M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 640	GeForce GT 750M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (FL11)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GT 750M). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M).

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 640	GeForce GT 750M
Encoder	Quick Sync Video	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	Quick Sync Video	NVDEC 1st gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 draws 15W versus the GeForce GT 750M's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 350W (GeForce GT 750M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 640	GeForce GT 750M
TDP	15W-70%	50W
Recommended PSU	0W-100%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80	80°C
Perf/Watt	90.2+239%	26.6

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 26.6 (GeForce GT 750M) — the Iris Plus Graphics 640 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).