Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2233.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 640.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2233.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2233.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 640 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Iris Plus Graphics 640
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Plus Graphics 640 scores 1,353 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 2233.9%. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm++ vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,353 | 31,578+2234% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 7680+1900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+4646% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 2610 MHz+137% |
| ROPs | 6 | 80+1233% |
| TMUs | 48 | 240+400% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 180% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 700W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 90.2 | 110.8+23% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 costs 100+% less ($590 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the Iris Plus Graphics 640 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 53.5 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT3e | AD104 |
| Release | January 3 2017 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #767 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics 640 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
