Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce MX110
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Popular choices:
GeForce MX110
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX110
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX110 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 640.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX110 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 640 and GeForce MX110
Iris Plus Graphics 640
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.
GeForce MX110
The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 scores 1,353 and the GeForce MX110 reaches 1,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce MX110 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 256 (GeForce MX110). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1006 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,353 | 1,415+5% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS+64% | 0.5151 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz+9% | 1006 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 8+33% |
| TMUs | 48+200% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX110 has 512 MB. The GeForce MX110 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 40 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 draws 15W versus the GeForce MX110's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 350W (GeForce MX110). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 90.2+91% | 47.2 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce MX110 launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 35.4 (GeForce MX110) — the Iris Plus Graphics 640 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 35.4 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM108S |
| Release | January 3 2017 | November 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #767 | #781 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics 640 and GeForce MX110
