Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs FirePro W4100
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Popular choices:
FirePro W4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Plus Graphics 650 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $183), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1123.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1123.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($183) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 650 and FirePro W4100
Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
FirePro W4100
The FirePro W4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 630 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,496 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 scores 1,500 and the FirePro W4100 reaches 1,496 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is built on Generation 9.5 while the FirePro W4100 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 512 (FirePro W4100). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 0.6451 TFLOPS (FirePro W4100).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,500 | 1,496 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8832 TFLOPS+37% | 0.6451 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W4100 has 2 GB. The FirePro W4100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 12 (FirePro W4100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W4100). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W4100).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 draws 15W versus the FirePro W4100's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 350W (FirePro W4100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 171mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 90°C.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 171mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85-6% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+234% | 29.9 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the FirePro W4100 launched at $183 and now averages $183. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 costs 91.8% less ($168 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 100.0 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 8.2 (FirePro W4100) — the Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers 1119.5% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $183 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-92% | $183 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.0+1120% | 8.2 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT3e | Cape Verde |
| Release | January 3 2017 | August 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #718 | #766 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics 650 and FirePro W4100
