Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce 845M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Plus Graphics 650

15

1,500

+0.9%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

1,487

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

TITAN V

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 845M

#249

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

584%

#251

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

529%

#252

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

528%

#256

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

480%

#257

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

477%

#259

GeForce 845M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#262

GeForce 945A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

100%

#263

Intel UHD Graphics P630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#264

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

99%

#265

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

MSRP: $300|Avg: $75

99%

#270

GeForce GTX 960A

MSRP: $199|Avg: $60

94%

#271

Radeon HD 8770

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

#273

Radeon R9 M295X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

92%

#274

GeForce GT 325M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 845M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Iris Plus Graphics 650	GeForce 845M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 Benchmark Check

GeForce 845M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 650 and GeForce 845M

Iris Plus Graphics 650

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

GeForce 845M

The GeForce 845M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 26 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1071 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,487 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 scores 1,500 and the GeForce 845M reaches 1,487 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce 845M uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 384 (GeForce 845M). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 845M). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1176 MHz.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 650	GeForce 845M
G3D Mark Score	1,500	1,487
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm++	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8832 TFLOPS	0.9032 TFLOPS+2%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz	1176 MHz+2%
ROPs	6	16+167%
TMUs	48+50%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 650	GeForce 845M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 845M has 512 MB. The GeForce 845M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 650	GeForce 845M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 845M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 650	GeForce 845M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 845M). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs H.264,HEVC (GeForce 845M).

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 650	GeForce 845M
Encoder	QuickSync	4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder	QuickSync	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 draws 15W versus the GeForce 845M's 33W — a 75% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 350W (GeForce 845M). Power connectors: Integrated vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.