Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GRID M10-1B
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Popular choices:
GRID M10-1B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-1B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-1B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 650.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Plus Graphics 650 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $150), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 897.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+897.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 650 and GRID M10-1B
Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
GRID M10-1B
The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 scores 1,500 and the GRID M10-1B reaches 1,504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GRID M10-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1B). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,500 | 1,504 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8832 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+446% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1178 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 6 | 64+967% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-1B has 512 MB. The GRID M10-1B offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1B). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 draws 15W versus the GRID M10-1B's 225W — a 175% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 350W (GRID M10-1B). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+1393% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GRID M10-1B launched at $2500 and now averages $150. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 100.0 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 10.0 (GRID M10-1B) — the Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers 900% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-90% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.0+900% | 10.0 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM204 |
| Release | January 3 2017 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #718 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics 650 and GRID M10-1B
