Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 650.

Insight	Iris Plus Graphics 650	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 Benchmark Check

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Iris Plus Graphics 650

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 scores 1,500 and the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 reaches 1,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses Generation 8.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 650	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
G3D Mark Score	1,500	1,538+3%
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Generation 8.0
Process Node	14 nm++	14 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8832 TFLOPS+5%	0.8448 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1150 MHz+5%	1100 MHz
ROPs	6	6
TMUs	48	48

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 650	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 650	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 draws 15W versus the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200's 15W — a 0% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 650	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
TDP	15W	15W
Recommended PSU	1W	1W
Power Connector	Integrated	Integrated
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	100.0	102.5+3%

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 100.0 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 650	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
MSRP	$0	$0
Avg Price (30d)	$15	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	100.0	Infinity
Codename	Kaby Lake GT3e	Broadwell GT3e
Release	January 3 2017	September 5 2014
Ranking	#718	#763