Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 1060
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 570.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (6 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 650.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-570.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+570.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $60), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 67.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 650 and GeForce GTX 1060
Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Plus Graphics 650 scores 1,500 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 570.9%. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm++ vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,500 | 10,064+571% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8832 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+905% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1733 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 6 | 64+967% |
| TMUs | 48 | 160+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 169.2% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-92% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 400W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 173mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+79% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 costs 75% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 100.0 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 67.7% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-75% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.0 | 167.7+68% |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT3e | GP104 |
| Release | January 3 2017 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #718 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics 650 and GeForce GTX 1060
