CPU
GPU
Iris Plus Graphics
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is significantly newer (2022 vs 0). The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 564.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-564.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+564.7%) |
| Longevity | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 77.3% better value per dollar than the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+77.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Plus Graphics scores 1,789 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 564.7%. The Iris Plus Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 10 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,789 | 11,892+565% |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2560+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+778% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1755 MHz+76% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: QuickSync vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | QuickSync | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 158.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-88% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 119.3+30% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The Iris Plus Graphics costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 77.4% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-60% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-73% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.7 | 79.3+77% |
| Codename | Ice Lake GT2 | GA106 |
| Release | sem dados | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #714 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
