Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs GeForce GTX 1650
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 299% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics MAX.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-299%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+299%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 112.8% better value per dollar than the Iris Xe Graphics MAX.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+112.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics MAX and GeForce GTX 1650
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Xe Graphics MAX scores 1,972 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 299%. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is built on Generation 12.1 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 10 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,972 | 7,869+299% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Turing |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 896+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.534 TFLOPS | 2.984 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 56+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 100% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-67% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 78.9 | 104.9+33% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX costs 46.7% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.3 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 112.8% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-63% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-47% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3 | 104.9+113% |
| Codename | DG1 | TU117 |
| Release | October 31 2020 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #685 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics MAX and GeForce GTX 1650
