M2 Pro vs Xeon Gold 6262

M2 Pro

12 Cores12 Thrd36 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6262

24 Cores48 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

M2 Pro vs Xeon Gold 6262 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M2 Pro vs Xeon Gold 6262 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M2 Pro vs Xeon Gold 6262: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M2 Pro

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 36W instead of 135W, a 99W reduction.
  • Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA 3647 and DDR4.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Pro GPU, while Xeon Gold 6262 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 33 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6262, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.

Xeon Gold 6262

2019

Why buy it

  • +37.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (21,823 vs 21,939).
  • 275% higher power demand at 135W vs 36W.
  • Older platform position on LGA 3647 with DDR4, while M2 Pro moves to none and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while M2 Pro can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is M2 Pro better than Xeon Gold 6262?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6262 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M2 Pro is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M2 Pro is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
M2 Pro still makes the most sense overall. M2 Pro comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M2 Pro makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA 3647, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 12 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M2 Pro vs Xeon Gold 6262 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M2 Pro

The M2 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6262

The Xeon Gold 6262 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA 3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,823 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The M2 Pro packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6262 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6262 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the M2 Pro versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6262 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6262 (base: 2.42 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). In PassMark, the M2 Pro scores 21,939 against the Xeon Gold 6262's 21,823 — a 0.5% lead for the M2 Pro. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M2 Pro vs 33 MB on the Xeon Gold 6262.

FeatureM2 ProXeon Gold 6262
Cores / Threads
12 / 12
24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.42 GHz+27%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB
33 MB+38%
L2 Cache
36 MB
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
PassMark
21,939
21,823
Geekbench 6 Single
2,650
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 Pro uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6262 uses LGA 3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM2 ProXeon Gold 6262
Socket
none
LGA 3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: ARM Virtualization (M2 Pro) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6262). The M2 Pro includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Pro GPU), while the Xeon Gold 6262 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Pro targets Professional Laptop.

FeatureM2 ProXeon Gold 6262
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M2 Pro GPU
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
ARM Virtualization
Target Use
Professional Laptop