M2 Pro vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M2 Pro vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M2 Pro vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M2 Pro

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 36W instead of 140W, a 104W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Pro GPU, while Ryzen Threadripper 1920 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,939 vs 22,066).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while M2 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌288.9% higher power demand at 140W vs 36W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while M2 Pro moves to none and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while M2 Pro can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1920 better than M2 Pro?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M2 Pro is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $799 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M2 Pro makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of SP3r2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M2 Pro vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M2 Pro

The M2 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The M2 Pro packs 12 cores / 12 threads, matching the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the M2 Pro versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 (base: 2.42 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Pro scores 21,939 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M2 Pro vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

Feature	M2 Pro	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Cores / Threads	12 / 12	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.42 GHz	3.2 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	24 MB	32 MB+33%
L2 Cache	36 MB+7100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	21,939	22,066
Geekbench 6 Single	2,650	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 Pro uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	M2 Pro	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Socket	none	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-6400	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: ARM Virtualization (M2 Pro) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920). The M2 Pro includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Pro GPU), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Pro targets Professional Laptop.