
M2 Pro

Ryzen 5 5600X3D
M2 Pro vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
M2 Pro vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
M2 Pro vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
M2 Pro
2023Why buy it
- ✅+27% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 36W instead of 105W, a 69W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Pro GPU, while Ryzen 5 5600X3D needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 96 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,087 vs 2,650).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,985 vs 14,450).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while M2 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌191.7% higher power demand at 105W vs 36W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M2 Pro moves to none and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is M2 Pro better than Ryzen 5 5600X3D?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M2 Pro vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M2 Pro
The M2 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 5600X3D
The Ryzen 5 5600X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,865 points. Launch price was $229.
Processing Power
The M2 Pro packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X3D offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the M2 Pro has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the M2 Pro versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X3D — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X3D (base: 2.42 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X3D is built on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Pro scores 21,939 against the Ryzen 5 5600X3D's 21,865 — a 0.3% lead for the M2 Pro. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,650 vs 2,087, a 23.8% lead for the M2 Pro that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,450 vs 1,985 (151.7% advantage for the M2 Pro). L3 cache: 24 MB on the M2 Pro vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600X3D.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Ryzen 5 5600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 2.42 GHz | 3.3 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 96 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+7100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | — | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 21,939 | 21,865 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,065 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,650+27% | 2,087 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,450+628% | 1,985 |
Memory & Platform
The M2 Pro uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X3D uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-6400 on the M2 Pro versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X3D — the M2 Pro supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (M2 Pro) vs 20 (Ryzen 5 5600X3D) — the Ryzen 5 5600X3D offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple Silicon (M2 Pro) and A520,B450,B550,X470,X570 (Ryzen 5 5600X3D).
| Feature | M2 Pro | Ryzen 5 5600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400+100% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: ARM Virtualization (M2 Pro) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 5600X3D). The M2 Pro includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Pro GPU), while the Ryzen 5 5600X3D requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Pro targets Professional Laptop.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Ryzen 5 5600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Apple M2 Pro GPU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | ARM Virtualization | Yes |
| Target Use | Professional Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













