
M2 Pro

Xeon Silver 4310
M2 Pro vs Xeon Silver 4310 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
M2 Pro vs Xeon Silver 4310 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
M2 Pro vs Xeon Silver 4310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
M2 Pro
2023Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 36W instead of 120W, a 84W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Pro GPU, while Xeon Silver 4310 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4310, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Silver 4310
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,903 vs 21,939).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 36W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while M2 Pro moves to none and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while M2 Pro can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is M2 Pro better than Xeon Silver 4310?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M2 Pro vs Xeon Silver 4310 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M2 Pro
The M2 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Silver 4310
The Xeon Silver 4310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,903 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The M2 Pro packs 12 cores / 12 threads, matching the Xeon Silver 4310's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the M2 Pro versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4310 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the M2 Pro (base: 2.42 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4310 is built on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Pro scores 21,939 against the Xeon Silver 4310's 21,903 — a 0.2% lead for the M2 Pro. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M2 Pro vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4310.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Xeon Silver 4310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.42 GHz+15% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+33% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | — | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,939 | 21,903 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,650 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,450 | — |
Memory & Platform
The M2 Pro uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4310 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-6400 on the M2 Pro versus 2667 on the Xeon Silver 4310 — the M2 Pro supports 140% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4310 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 19100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (M2 Pro) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4310). PCIe lanes: 0 (M2 Pro) vs 64 (Xeon Silver 4310) — the Xeon Silver 4310 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple Silicon (M2 Pro) and LGA4189 (Xeon Silver 4310).
| Feature | M2 Pro | Xeon Silver 4310 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400+140% | 2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 6144 GB+19100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Silver 4310 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: ARM Virtualization (M2 Pro) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4310). The M2 Pro includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Pro GPU), while the Xeon Silver 4310 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Pro targets Professional Laptop.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Xeon Silver 4310 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Apple M2 Pro GPU | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | ARM Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














