M4 Pro (12 cores)
VS
Xeon Silver 4316

M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Xeon Silver 4316

M4 Pro (12 cores)

12 Cores12 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.51 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4316

20 Cores40 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M4 Pro (12 cores)

#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
108%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
107%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
106%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
103%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
101%
#171
M4 Pro (12 cores)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
98%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
95%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
94%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
94%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
90%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Silver 4316

#295
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
MSRP: $2649|Avg: $2782
107%
#296
Xeon Platinum 8380
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $965
107%
#297
EPYC 7453
MSRP: $1570|Avg: $1253
107%
#298
Xeon Gold 5418Y
MSRP: $1483|Avg: N/A
106%
#299
Xeon w5-3425
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $1189
105%
#300
EPYC 9255
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $1934
105%
#301
EPYC 8324P
MSRP: $1895|Avg: $3598
104%
#302
Xeon Gold 6414U
MSRP: $2296|Avg: $283
104%
#303
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $2495
104%
#304
EPYC 7352
MSRP: $1350|Avg: $725
103%
#305
Xeon w7-2475X
MSRP: $1789|Avg: $2544
103%
#307
Xeon W-3323
MSRP: $949|Avg: $500
101%
#308
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $100
101%
#309
Xeon W-2255
MSRP: $778|Avg: $350
100%
#310
Xeon Silver 4316
MSRP: $1126|Avg: $1200
100%
#311
Xeon w7-3545
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $2039
99%
#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
98%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
98%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
98%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
98%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
97%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
96%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
96%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
96%
#321
Xeon W-3335
MSRP: $1430|Avg: $1200
95%
#322
EPYC 9354P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $2205
95%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
92%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
92%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($1,200) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Silver 4316 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightM4 Pro (12 cores)Xeon Silver 4316
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M4 Pro (12 cores) ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($1,200 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightM4 Pro (12 cores)Xeon Silver 4316
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon Silver 4316

M4 Pro (12 cores)

The M4 Pro (12 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.592 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 32,853 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4316

The Xeon Silver 4316 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 32,556 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The M4 Pro (12 cores) packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4316 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Silver 4316 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.51 GHz on the M4 Pro (12 cores) versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4316 — a 28.1% clock advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores) (base: 2.592 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4316 is built on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (12 cores) scores 32,853 against the Xeon Silver 4316's 32,556 — a 0.9% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores). Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,904 vs 21,846 (14.4% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4316). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,812 vs 1,621, a 80.7% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores) that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,076 vs 13,010 (42.7% advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores)).

FeatureM4 Pro (12 cores)Xeon Silver 4316
Cores / Threads
12 / 12
20 / 40+67%
Boost Clock
4.51 GHz+33%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.592 GHz+13%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-70%
10 nm
Architecture
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
32,853
32,556
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,904
21,846+16%
Geekbench 6 Single
3,812+135%
1,621
Geekbench 6 Multi
20,076+54%
13,010
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 Pro (12 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4316 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the M4 Pro (12 cores) versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Silver 4316 — the M4 Pro (12 cores) supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4316 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 195.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4316). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 64 (Xeon Silver 4316) — the Xeon Silver 4316 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple SoC (M4 Pro (12 cores)) and C620 (Xeon Silver 4316).

FeatureM4 Pro (12 cores)Xeon Silver 4316
Socket
none
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8000+25%
DDR4-2667
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
6144 GB+9500%
RAM Channels
1
8+700%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Silver 4316 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Apple Virtualization (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4316). The M4 Pro (12 cores) includes integrated graphics (M4 Pro 16-core GPU), while the Xeon Silver 4316 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M4 Pro (12 cores) targets High-end Content Creation, Xeon Silver 4316 targets Budget Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (12 cores) rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS; Xeon Silver 4316 rivals EPYC 7313.

FeatureM4 Pro (12 cores)Xeon Silver 4316
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
M4 Pro 16-core GPU
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
Apple Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-end Content Creation
Budget Server / Virtualization