
MediaTek Kompanio 838

Ryzen 7 5700X
MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
MediaTek Kompanio 838
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (5,343 vs 26,609).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +117.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than MediaTek Kompanio 838?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
MediaTek Kompanio 838
The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022β2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The MediaTek Kompanio 838 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 5700X's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X β a 70.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022β2024) architecture, while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the MediaTek Kompanio 838 scores 5,343 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 β a 133.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | MediaTek Kompanio 838 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+109% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | β | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | β | 512K (per core) |
| Process | β | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022β2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 5,343 | 26,609+398% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 9,715 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (MediaTek Kompanio 838) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | MediaTek Kompanio 838 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















