Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
VS
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

1 Cores2 Thrd70 WWMax: 3.07 GHz2003
VS
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is positioned at rank 673 and the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is on rank 1079, so the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

#661
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
926%
#662
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
913%
#663
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
838%
#664
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
834%
#665
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
827%
#667
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
798%
#668
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
765%
#669
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
764%
#670
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
744%
#673
Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#681
Core i3-N305
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

#1067
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2905%
#1068
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2862%
#1069
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2628%
#1070
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2616%
#1071
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2592%
#1073
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2503%
#1074
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2400%
#1075
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2396%
#1076
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2332%
#1079
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
100%
#1082
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
99%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
98%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
95%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
94%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
94%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 leads in gaming performance. However, the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 6.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightMobile Pentium 4 3.06Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Newark (2003) / Standard Node)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightMobile Pentium 4 3.06Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Newark (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.07 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ — a 42.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses Newark (2003). In PassMark, the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 scores 475 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+'s 505 — a 6.1% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+.

FeatureMobile Pentium 4 3.06Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
3.07 GHz+53%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB+100%
Process
130 nm
Architecture
Northwood (2002−2004)
Newark (2003)
PassMark
475
505+6%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureMobile Pentium 4 3.06Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Socket
PGA478
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
400
Max RAM Capacity
2
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Mobile Pentium 4 3.06) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ rivals Pentium M 735.

FeatureMobile Pentium 4 3.06Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false