
MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is positioned at rank 745 and the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is on rank 744, so the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9200.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 33.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9200 and MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MOBILITY RADEON 9200
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 scores 3 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 4 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is built on TeraScale 2 while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 65 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 50W — a 0% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 50% better value.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.3+50% |
| Codename | Broadway | Broadway |
| Release | January 7 2010 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #846 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















