MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is positioned at rank #745 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9200

#735

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

180950%

#737

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

164033%

#738

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

163600%

#742

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

148767%

#743

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

147750%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

100%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

83%

#748

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

67%

#749

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

67%

#750

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

50%

#751

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

50%

#752

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

50%

#753

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

50%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

33%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

17%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

17%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9200.

Insight	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+693.7%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $49), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 145% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+145%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($15)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200 Benchmark Check

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9200 and MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 scores 3 versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 4 — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is built on TeraScale 2 while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40
L1 Cache	80 KB	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 has 512 MB. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
DirectX	8.1	8.1
Max Displays	0	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 10W — a 133.3% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
TDP	50W	10W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	0W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	1mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.4+300%

💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers 100% better value.