MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs GeForce3 Ti 200
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Popular choices:
GeForce3 Ti 200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is positioned at rank 745 and the GeForce3 Ti 200 is on rank 382, so the GeForce3 Ti 200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3 Ti 200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2010). The GeForce3 Ti 200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9200.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the GeForce3 Ti 200, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 145% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+145%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9200 and GeForce3 Ti 200
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
GeForce3 Ti 200
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 scores 3 versus the GeForce3 Ti 200's 4 — the GeForce3 Ti 200 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce3 Ti 200 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Turing |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2944+268% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 10.07 TFLOPS+799% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 184+360% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 2.9 MB+3525% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce3 Ti 200 has 512 MB. The GeForce3 Ti 200 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the GeForce3 Ti 200's 215W — a 124.5% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 183mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 215W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 183mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce3 Ti 200 launched at $149 and now averages $49. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 0.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers 100% better value. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-67% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-69% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2+100% | 0.1 |
| Codename | Broadway | TU104 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | September 20 2018 |
| Ranking | #846 | #94 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON 9200 and GeForce3 Ti 200
