
MOBILITY RADEON 9800

Radeon Xpress 1300M
MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
2010Why buy it
- β +15% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon Xpress 1300M
2019Why buy it
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- β MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Xpress 1300M is the less risky modern option long term.
- β More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019β2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (40 vs 46).
- βOlder hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- β70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800
The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 46 points.

Radeon Xpress 1300M
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 scores 46 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 40 β the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 leads by 15%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 46+15% | 40 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1280+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 3.2 TFLOPS+186% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300M carries 512 MB. Radeon Xpress 1300M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 and 64-bit on the Radeon Xpress 1300M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) β the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs None (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Decoder: VideoShader HD vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300M).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | VideoShader HD | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 draws 50W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W β a 51.9% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-41% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9+80% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Xpress 1300M (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | β |
| Codename | Broadway | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #846 | #403 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














