NVS 310
VS
GeForce 7800 GTX

NVS 310 vs GeForce 7800 GTX

NVS 310

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 7800 GTX

2008Core: 500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 310 is positioned at rank 305 and the GeForce 7800 GTX is on rank 722, so the NVS 310 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 310

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
91%
#290
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
8539%
#305
NVS 310
MSRP: $159|Avg: $10
100%
#306
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
100%
#308
FirePro 3D V3750
MSRP: $199|Avg: $25
99%
#309
NVS 810
MSRP: $700|Avg: $80
98%
#310
GRID P40-2Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340
97%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
95%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
94%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
92%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
91%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
91%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
89%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
88%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
88%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7800 GTX

#712
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
24127%
#714
21871%
#715
21813%
#719
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
19836%
#720
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
19700%
#722
GeForce 7800 GTX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
100%
#723
RADEON 9600SE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $65
93%
#724
Radeon X1200
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
91%
#725
Radeon 2100
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
89%
#726
GeForce 6800
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
84%
#727
Radeon 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $30
82%
#728
GeForce 6800 GT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
80%
#729
GeForce 7950 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $80
76%
#730
Mobility Radeon X1450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
73%
#731
MOBILITY RADEON X1800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
73%
#732
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
67%
#733
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
67%
#734
GeForce 6200
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
64%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
49%
#737
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
44%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The NVS 310 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The NVS 310 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 7800 GTX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The NVS 310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7800 GTX.

InsightNVS 310GeForce 7800 GTX
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The NVS 310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the NVS 310 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $40), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 310.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightNVS 310GeForce 7800 GTX
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+310.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of NVS 310 and GeForce 7800 GTX

NVIDIA

NVS 310

The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 7800 GTX

The GeForce 7800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 268 points.

Graphics Performance

The NVS 310 scores 275 and the GeForce 7800 GTX reaches 268 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 310 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 7800 GTX uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 310) vs 224 (GeForce 7800 GTX).

FeatureNVS 310GeForce 7800 GTX
G3D Mark Score
275+3%
268
Architecture
Maxwell
G9x
Process Node
28 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
512 ×2+129%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureNVS 310GeForce 7800 GTX
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureNVS 310GeForce 7800 GTX
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (NVS 310) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7800 GTX). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureNVS 310GeForce 7800 GTX
DirectX
12 (11_0)+33%
9.0c
OpenGL
4.6+119%
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Fermi NVENC (NVS 310) vs No (GeForce 7800 GTX). Decoder: VP4 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (NVS 310) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 7800 GTX).

FeatureNVS 310GeForce 7800 GTX
Encoder
Fermi NVENC
No
Decoder
VP4
PureVideo
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 310 draws 68W versus the GeForce 7800 GTX's 150W — a 75.2% difference. The NVS 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 310) vs 350W (GeForce 7800 GTX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 228mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureNVS 310GeForce 7800 GTX
TDP
68W-55%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
228mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
4.0+122%
1.8
💰

Value Analysis

The NVS 310 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 7800 GTX launched at $599 and now averages $40. The NVS 310 costs 75% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.5 (NVS 310) vs 6.7 (GeForce 7800 GTX) — the NVS 310 offers 310.4% better value. The NVS 310 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureNVS 310GeForce 7800 GTX
MSRP
$159-73%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$10-75%
$40
Performance per Dollar
27.5+310%
6.7
Codename
GM107
NB9E-GTX
Release
November 4 2015
July 15 2008
Ranking
#826
#825