CPU
GPU
NVS 810
Popular choices:
Quadro M500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 810 is positioned at rank 309 and the Quadro M500M is on rank 31, so the Quadro M500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar NVS 810
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M500M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The NVS 810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M500M.
| Insight | NVS 810 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the NVS 810 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of NVS 810 and Quadro M500M
NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.
Quadro M500M
The Quadro M500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 27 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
The NVS 810 scores 1,192 and the Quadro M500M reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro M500M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 384 (Quadro M500M). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro M500M). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,192+2% | 1,172 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 ×2+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+23% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1124 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 ×2+100% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | NVS 810 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The NVS 810 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M500M has 2 GB. The NVS 810 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the Quadro M500M's 30W — a 77.6% difference. The Quadro M500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 350W (Quadro M500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W | 30W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 198mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5 | 39.1+123% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M500M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | NVS 810 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $700 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | — |
| Codename | GM107 | GM108 |
| Release | November 4 2015 | April 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #826 | #833 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on NVS 810 and Quadro M500M
