Pentium M 760 vs Celeron 570

Pentium M 760

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 2 GHz2005

Celeron 570

31 WW2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Pentium M 760

1 / 1

515

+2.0%

Celeron 2.10

Pentium M 1.40

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

505

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 760 is positioned at rank 636 and the Celeron 570 is on rank 1230, so the Pentium M 760 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 760

#187

Core Ultra 9 288V

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

98%

#188

Core i7-10870H

MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A

98%

#624

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

855%

#625

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

842%

#626

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

773%

#627

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

770%

#628

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

763%

#630

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

736%

#631

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

706%

#632

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

705%

#633

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

686%

#636

Pentium M 760

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#638

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

99%

#650

Core i5-1345UE

MSRP: $312|Avg: $312

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 570

#1218

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

7782%

#1219

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

7668%

#1220

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

7040%

#1221

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

7008%

#1222

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

6944%

#1224

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

6706%

#1225

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

6430%

#1226

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

6419%

#1227

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

6247%

#1230

Celeron 570

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

100%

#1231

Core i7-820QM

MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A

88%

#1233

Core Duo T2700

MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A

75%

#1235

Pentium SU4100

MSRP: $289|Avg: $15

63%

#1236

Core Solo T1400

MSRP: $200|Avg: $5

57%

#1237

Core i7-940XM

MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A

55%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

54%

#1240

Core Solo T1300

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

49%

#1241

Core Solo T1200

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

45%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium M 760 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 570 in both compute-intensive tasks (2% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Pentium M 760	Celeron 570
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Pentium M 760	Celeron 570
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Pentium M 760 Benchmark Check

Celeron 570 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 760 and Celeron 570

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium M 760 is built on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium M 760 scores 515 against the Celeron 570's 505 — a 2% lead for the Pentium M 760. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium M 760 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 570.

Feature	Pentium M 760	Celeron 570
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	—
Boost Clock	2 GHz	—
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.26 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB	—
Process	90 nm	65 nm-28%
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	—
PassMark	515+2%	505
Geekbench 6 Single	240	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR2-533 memory speed. The Celeron 570 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 915GM,915PM (Pentium M 760) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron 570).

Feature	Pentium M 760	Celeron 570
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-533	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: not specified (Pentium M 760) / No (Celeron 570). Primary use case: Pentium M 760 targets Mobile, Celeron 570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750; Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.