Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 145

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 145 Performance Spectrum

Pentium M 760

1 / 1

515

0.0%

Atom N280

Pentium M 1.40

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

544

+5.6%

Athlon XP 2200+

Athlon XP 2700+

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Athlon 64 3100+

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 145 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 145: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 760

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 27W instead of 45W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Sempron 145 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (515 vs 544).

Sempron 145

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 27W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 145 better than Pentium M 760?

Yes. Sempron 145 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 145 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 145 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 145 still makes the most sense overall. Sempron 145 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 145 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 145 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 145

The Sempron 145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 544 points. Launch price was $95.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 760 and Sempron 145 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 versus 2.8 GHz on the Sempron 145 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Sempron 145 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium M 760 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Sempron 145 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 760 scores 515 against the Sempron 145's 544 — a 5.5% lead for the Sempron 145. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 760	Sempron 145
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.8 GHz+40%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.8 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	90 nm	45 nm-50%
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark	515	544+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	240	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 760 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 145 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.