Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 3800+

Intel

Pentium M 760

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 2 GHz2005
VS
AMD

Sempron 3800+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2006

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 3800+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 3800+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 3800+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 760

2005

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 27W instead of 62W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (515 vs 528).

Sempron 3800+

2006

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌129.6% higher power demand at 62W vs 27W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Sempron 3800+ better than Pentium M 760?
    Yes. Sempron 3800+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 2.5% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Sempron 3800+ has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 10% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Sempron 3800+ still makes the most sense overall. Sempron 3800+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 2.5% higher PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 3800+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 3800+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium M 760

    The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004βˆ’2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron 3800+

    The Sempron 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001βˆ’2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 528 points. Launch price was $21.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    Both the Pentium M 760 and Sempron 3800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 versus 2.2 GHz on the Sempron 3800+ β€” a 9.5% clock advantage for the Sempron 3800+. The Pentium M 760 uses the Dothan (2004βˆ’2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Sempron 3800+ uses Manila (2001βˆ’2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 760 scores 515 against the Sempron 3800+'s 528 β€” a 2.5% lead for the Sempron 3800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeaturePentium M 760Sempron 3800+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz
    2.2 GHz+10%
    Base Clock
    2 GHz
    β€”
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    2 MB+700%
    256 kB
    Process
    90 nm
    90 nm
    Architecture
    Dothan (2004βˆ’2005)
    Manila (2001βˆ’2006)
    PassMark
    515
    528+3%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    240
    β€”
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium M 760 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium M 760Sempron 3800+
    Socket
    PGA478
    AM2
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-533
    β€”
    Max RAM Capacity
    2 GB
    β€”
    RAM Channels
    2
    β€”
    ECC Support
    No
    β€”
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    β€”
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Primary use case: Pentium M 760 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750.

    FeaturePentium M 760Sempron 3800+
    Integrated GPU
    No
    β€”
    Unlocked
    No
    β€”
    AVX-512
    No
    β€”
    Target Use
    Mobile
    β€”